Henry Inman and Edward Greene Malbone ~ portraits of the John Corliss family late 18th and early 19th century.
Interesting
hereditary or genetic comparisons of John A Corliss, Esq. painted by *Henry Inman, and his
(likely) father and
mother in two miniatures painted by *Edward Malbone. Note strong facial
comparisons of forehead, mouth and chin to John Corliss senior. Eyes of John A
Corliss are brown and identical to his mother's eyes, and their noses
are identical also. (See mother's portrait photo below father's
miniature). The Corliss family dates to
George
Corliss, the founder of the family in America, who was born in the
county of Devonshire, England, about 1617, he came to this country in
1639. Many descendants
were (and still
are) prominent New England families, many from Rhode Island. John
Corliss (senior) operated a sea shipping company sailing out of Newport Rhode Island
the first quarter of the 19th century.
|
||||||
Henry Inman
1801 ~ 1845 American Artist Oil on canvass on board. exposed oil size approx 6 1/2 by 8 inches
Portrait of John A Corliss Esq. Circa 1830
|
Edward Greene Malbone American artist 1777 - 1807 Miniature Watercolor on Ivory size approx 2 1/2 by 3 1/2 inches
Portrait of John Corliss Circa
1795
|
Henry Inman Bio:
Henry Inman: Born at Utica, New York, Henry Inman moved with his parents to New York City, where he began a seven-year apprenticeship under portraitist John Wesley Jarvis. In 1824 Inman established his own studio in the city. Two years later he helped to found the National Academy of Design, serving as its vice president until 1831, when he moved to Philadelphia to become a partner in the lithographic firm of Childs and Inman. He returned to New York City in 1834 and enjoyed considerable success over the next ten years as a portrait painter, including among his sitters President Martin Van Buren and Chief Justice John Marshall. Inman's last important commission took him to England in 1844-45 to paint the portraits of Lord Macaulay and of the poet William Wordsworth. He died within a few months of his return to the States.
While abroad, Inman painted the portrait of Scottish nobleman Sir William
Drummond Stewart (below), who had undertaken an expedition into the American
West in 1837 accompanied by Alfred Jacob Miller, a Baltimore artist. Miller
produced a number of works for Stewart at Murthly Castle in Scotland, where he
met Inman. A collection of Miller's watercolors and the Inman portrait of
Stewart ultimately were purchased by Joslyn Art Museum. Stewart's portrait is
one of the last that Inman painted and, arguably, one of the best.
Left: Sir William D Stewart |
|
|
Some portrait photos & data from http://www.joslyn.org/collections-and-exhibitions/permanent-collections/american/henry-inman-portrait-of-william-drummond-stewart/
Henry G. Stebbins
Henry Inman (American, Utica, New York 1801–1846 New York City)
Date: 1838
Medium: Oil on canvas
Dimensions: 30 x 24 in. (76.2 x 61 cm)
Classification: Paintings
Credit Line: Bequest of Josephine S. Stebbins, 2000
Accession Number: 2001.269
Signatures, Inscriptions, and Markings
Inscription:
on lining on reverse, twice]: H. Stebbins Esq. / Painted by H. Inman / N. York
1838
[This inscription on an old lining canvas appears to reproduce an
inscription on the original canvas back
Provenance Descended in the family of the sitter to the donor, by bequest.
NOTE: the Inman painting of "John A Corliss Esg." is inscribed
on
verso similar to the painting above of Stebbins.
Oil on canvass and mounted on board: 6 1/2" X 8"
See photos below of verso and original label marked John A Corliss, Esq. by
Henry Inman, and a later collection label affixed at top referring to the bottom
inscription again (very faint label):
Click photos to enlarge...
Persons having an interest or further
information on this branch of the Corliss family, especially John A
Corliss and this recently |
More Research information...
HENRY INMAN "Portrait of the Artist's Daughter, Mary"
Property of a Corporate Collection American (1801-1846) oil on canvas on board, 5 x 7 1/4, signed lower left and dated 1843. Provenance: M. Knoedler & Co., New York, New York; Mrs. Norman B. Woolworth, Maine; Sarah Mleczko Fine Art, New York. Exhibited: Portland Museum of Art, Portland, Maine, n.d.; The National Portrait Gallery, Washington, D.C., April 3 - August 2, 1987.
The above Inman Oil on canvas on board is of similar construction and size to the John A Corliss Esq. painting
Excerpt from the a
genealogy found online
“56 CORLISS FAMILY RECORD.
Children :
1010. A daughter. May 18, 1797, d. May 21, 1797.
(2040) 1011. Tristram, June "^13, 1798.
1012. John, Jan. 9, 1800. d. Mar. 1, 1800.
(2044) 1013. * John, b. Feb. 12, 1801, d. Jan. 9, 1869e "
*This John Corliss may be the sitter in Inman’s portrait, the d & b dates are
certainly right…Inman likely painted John A Corliss around 1830-35 which would
make the sitter around 30-35 years, which age the sitter appears to be.
This following Antiques Magazine article – makes reference to John Corliss (perhaps father or
grandfather 0f John A Corliss?) Sitting for a miniature in 1795 for artist
Edward Greene Malbone...
“Portrait
miniatures in the New Republic”
April 2009 | The stunning events of July 1804 were almost unfathomable for the
citizens of the new American republic. One Founding Father had fatally wounded
another. Alexander Hamilton was dead and Aaron Burr would be indicted for
murder. The duel and its aftermath marked a turning point in American culture.
Five days before the Burr-Hamilton duel, Edward Greene Malbone arrived for a week’s stay in New York. Considered the finest miniaturist in the United States, Malbone was attractive, popular, already exceedingly successful, and only twenty-six years old. As Hamilton’s massive funeral snaked up Broadway on July 14, he was meeting twenty-five year-old Anson Dickinson for the first time. A fledgling artist, Dickinson had commissioned Malbone to paint his miniature, hoping to learn by watching the more experienced artist at work (Fig. 1).1 So absorbed was Malbone in the painting “that he neither paused himself to view the pageant nor suffered his sitter to do so.”2
Around the corner on Wall Street, twenty-five-year-old Joseph Wood and twenty-three-year-old John Wesley Jarvis had recently formed an artistic partnership. All four artists, soon to be fast friends, were young, handsome, and ridiculously talented. Within three years, Malbone would be dead, but before that, the creative cross-pollination between these four young artists would allow them to develop a singular style that could never be mistaken for anything other than uniquely American.
So pervasive was their influence that when he came on the scene in 1818, the academically trained Daniel Dickinson (1795–c. 1866), younger brother of Anson, still turned to the model established by the quartet many years before. “I adopted a style between my brother Anson’s, Malbone’s and J. Wood’s, fifteen years after my brother commenced,” he wrote.3
In
the decades since the 1740s American portrait miniatures had changed little.
They were small, dark, and resembled provincial British works, which, indeed,
they were. The most successful artists were still either British (Archibald
Robertson [1765–1835], Robert Field [c. 1769–1819]) or had trained there
(Charles Willson Peale [1741–1827]). Their American patrons, eager for what was
familiar, did not encourage improvement.
That
was about to change.
Edward Greene Malbone
Leaving his family in Newport, Rhode Island, to establish himself as an artist
in Providence, Edward Greene Malbone struck out on his own in 1794 at the age of
seventeen. His earliest miniatures of 1794 and 1795 followed a standard English
formula of placing the sitter in front of red drapery. Though he was painting on
ivory, the young artist was not yet accomplished enough to make use of the
material’s luminosity. The works are characterized by opaque watercolors and
strong outlines (see Fig. 2).
Malbone advanced swiftly. By the end of 1795 his style had changed completely.
The red drapery disappeared and, as illustrated in his portraits of
*John
Corliss and his wife Susannah (nee Russell) of Providence (Smithsonian American
Art Museum, Washington), backgrounds were strongly hatched on a diagonal".
*may
be John A Corliss’s Father & Mother?
Mr. John Corliss 1795 By Edward Greene Malbone Born: Newport, Rhode Island 1777 Died: Savannah, Georgia 1807 watercolor on ivory sight 2 7/8 x 2 3/8 in. (7.3 x 6.0 cm) oval Smithsonian American Art Museum 3rd Floor, Luce Foundation Center 1980.29.2 |
Mrs. John Corliss (Susannah Condé Russell) 1795 Edward Greene Malbone Born: Newport, Rhode Island 1777 Died: Savannah, Georgia 1807 watercolor on ivory sight 2 7/8 x 2 3/8 in. (7.3 x 6.0 cm) oval Smithsonian American Art Museum -Museum purchase 1980.29.2 Smithsonian American Art Museum 3rd Floor, Luce Foundation Center |
Antiques Magazine article…”New York style, a new generation”
Henry Inman
Young Henry Inman walked into a fortuitous situation when, in 1814, he signed on
as Jarvis’s apprentice. Equally fond of joking and pranks, and showing enormous
promise as an artist, Inman spent a happy seven years with his master. Together
they traveled from Boston to New Orleans. By the end of his service, Inman was
an accomplished artist with important connections and amusing tales.
Upon striking out on his own in 1821, Inman took on Thomas Seir Cummings as his apprentice, and by 1824 they were partners, often finishing and signing works together (see Fig. 16). Dunlap recorded, however, that “Inman devoted himself almost exclusively to oil painting, leaving Cummings, in the year 1827, the best instructed miniature painter in the United States.”23
Learning by example of what not to do, this new generation of New York artists—Rogers, Inman, and Cummings—tutored by the erratic geniuses Jarvis and Wood were the first to approach art as a business.24 They had stable marriages, sturdy families, and strong work ethics. All three became founding members of the National Academy of Design. Cummings would teach miniature painting there for more than thirty years, additionally serving as professor of the arts of design at the College of the City of New York. For the next three decades, virtually every young miniaturist passing through New York in search of academic training would be touched by Cummings. In 1834 he wrote: “Works in miniature should possess the same beauty of composition, correctness of drawing, breadth of light and shade, brilliancy, truth of colour, and firmness of touch, as works executed on a larger scale” (see Fig. 17).25 Cummings, more than any other artist of his generation would influence the next generation of New York miniaturists. The look and technique that had evolved from Malbone to Dickinson, Jarvis, and Wood, then to Rogers and Inman, and subsequently to Cummings, was, by 1830, recognized as the uniquely American “National Academy” style...
Research & Data compiled by BEAMSCO from many online resources, for which excerpts & photos we gratefully acknowledge and give thanks.